Food, Inc.

Create Explore Learn & support
Get started
Log in
Pricing
Get started

Log in My Prezis Explore Learn & support

Product Company Careers Support Community Contact Apps
English Español 한국어 日本語 Deutsch Português Français Magyar Italiano

Houston, we have a problem!

Oops. A firewall is blocking access to Prezi content. Check out this article to learn more or contact your system administrator.

Stand out and be remembered with Prezi,
the secret weapon of great presenters.
What is Prezi?

Learn more

Loading presentation…

Public

& reusable

Create your own

Make a copy

Share

Embed

Liked

Like

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

Delete Cancel

Food Inc.

No description

by

on 4 November 2013

Tweet

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Food Inc.

Rhetorical analysis of clip
In the documentary “ Food Inc” it uses emotional appeal to show the cruelty of what the food industry had done with taking the beaks off of the baby chicks. By using baby chicks that had just hatched, this can appeal to the audience of innocent young chicks just tossed around through the conveyer belt when the worker take off the beak and pass it on to the next procedure. Another emotional appeal is when E.coli was present in the beef that a young child ate from. He ends up dying just within twelve days when the company of the beef was not in contact until sixteen days after. By using logical appeal, Food Inc shows the negative impact that the food corporations has on the environment like using pesticides and herbicides in water. In this clip it also uses some rhetorical devices like irony. It’s ironic how labels say farm grown but it technically means that the food was processed in a factory.
Food Inc.
Assertions/Validity/Structure
Some assertions made in Food Inc. were: three mega slaughterhouses for that nation means there can be parts of a thousand different cows in a single hamburger; three to four companies control meat production in America, a typical chicken grower (no longer called farmer) in Kentucky has borrowed $500,000 and makes about $18,000 a year. All these things were then proved by facts or interviews done with people that know about the topic.
The argument proposed by Robert Kenner in Food Inc. has validity because he uses facts that are proven by statistic and researchers. This film goes deep into the slaughter house of meat producers and uncovers the truth of the treatment and unsanitary ways the animals are kept, by doing so it improves their argument because it shows that they have proof to back up what they are saying. Kenner and his team also include a view of all angles from talking to authors, advocates, farmers, and CEOs,

All the images shown that negatively portray the food industry makes the viewer have a sense of pity and disgust towards the industries. The argument structured so that the situation is presented first by the traditional farming ways, and then followed by the contrast of the new farming techniques, why they are wrong, and how it harms the customer’s health.
Viewpoint and tone
The attitude and viewpoint of Robert Kenner director of Food Inc. can be inferred from the tone of the documentary. Since the beginning of the film, there was already an ominous mood, with the creepy music zooming out. Clearly there is no joyous point of view this topic, Kenner is revealing all the secrets and injustice done to these animals. His viewpoint is that, there has to be a change, to tell the people to stop and look at what has America come to, producing contaminated food, not only hurting animals but also the people. Robert Kenner would not risk attacking major companies for nothing, no; there was a purpose for the publication of this documentary that was nominated for best documentary at the 82nd Academy Awards. The director wants the people to know the truth of what is happening, he had the courage to tackle such a very little discussed topic, his viewpoint is that people should know where there food is coming, how it is being made, what exactly goes into the food and how it affects the economy, our bodies, the animals themselves, and future generations to come.
Cinematic techniques
The cinematic techniques the film used were the framing. In the beginning of the documentary, it was zoomed in at the farmhouse then zooms out to where the farmhouse was a picture, to reveal that it was hanging in a market. Then the framing was set in the middle of a shopping cart as it passed through the aisle. This reveals the many amount of food product that came from farms which is over forty thousands of it did.

As the film continues on, music in the background starts playing. The music sounds eerie, innocent but can be suspicious that lies within the products. Along with the music is narration added to the film. The sharp narration allows the audience sees the narrator’s confirm statement of the current scene that is taken place.

The lighting in this film of the factory was damp and not well lit. Due to the lighting it shows how the processing of food can be horrid. It was shown how bad the factory of food industry could be on the inside what may not look how it does on the outside. There were only several lights that is only shown on some party of the factory, but not as many that it can fully lit the whole entire factory. The food coming from the factory is just as dangerous that the setting it was taken place.

Video Clip
Purpose & Argument
The purpose of this film to expose the truth behind the food industry. The filmmaker wants you to know how corrupt food processing has become. It shows many different scenes portraying the cruelty towards animals like cutting off the tails of cows and cutting of the beaks of baby chickens. This film uses interviews from farmers to back up their argument. Companies like Tyson refused to be interviewed which shows that they don’t want the people to know what is going on in their industry. Their overall argument is that we should stop buying from these industries because of their dishonesty. They want you to buy organic food instead. They want the people to be aware of where their food comes from and how it was deal with.

Director
Robert Kenner is a dedicated filmmaker that has produced several documentaries; Food Inc. Two Days in October, American Experience, The Blues, Russia’s Last Tsar, Influenza: 1918, War Letters, John Brown’s Holy War, and When Strangers Click. He worked over six years to produce Food Inc, gathering information and trying to back up his argument. In Food Inc, Kenner, tries to open up societies views on how the meat industry deceives the buyer. His most recent work When Strangers Click is nominated for an Emmy award.
Film background
This film was published in 2008; it took 3 years in the making due to so much money used against lawsuits from all of the companies mentioned in the film. The film placed fourth place for best documentary at the 35th Seattle International Film Festival, and was nominated for best documentary at the 85th Annual Academy Awards. After the film was published it has now teamed up and sponsored Take Part. Where you can team up with others and talk about healthy eating. This year they had a contest called the Food, Inc. Awards where people can enter to win the Lifestyle Award or the Pioneer Award.
Historical context
The historical context of the documentary is that is shows the changes that have happened in general with the food industry. For example they have a cartoon of what chicken looked like in 1970 and a chicken in 2007, a major difference. The documentary shows how farmers today don’t really farm anymore; the use of GMO’s that we didn’t have 50 years ago. It shows the growth yet the damage of technology. Farmers and crop growers didn’t put any chemicals or modified seeds into the soil to feed the animals, or the fact that only a handful of meat companies are in charge of distributing meat, is a sign of danger.
Brief overview
The beginning of the film portrays the changes in the meat industry, giving statistics on what is actually going on in the farms. Giving information of how the farms mistreat the animals, or they can’t show or give information on what they do to the animals. From there the film goes to the topic of what the animals actually eat, like corn and soybeans and the mass production. Saying how scientists now are able to grow more corn now that they have genetically modified it. The end of the film focuses on the companies themselves how they use the law to benefit themselves. They also show the chemicals they put in the food, like fertilizers, to contaminate the food, and yet at the end they show a little bit of brightness by giving information on how people are going more towards organic food.

Full transcript

More presentations by

  • Copy of Food Inc.

    Copy of Food Inc.

  • Untitled Prezi

    Untitled Prezi

Popular presentations

    See more popular or the latest prezis

    • Prezi

    • Product
    • Gallery
    • The Science
    • Conversational Presenting
    • For Business
    • Testimonials
    • Company

    • About
    • Team
    • Careers
    • Our Values
    • Press
    • Our Customers
    • Company Information
    • Contact Us
    • Languages

    • English
    • Español
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • Deutsch
    • Português
    • Français
    • Magyar
    • Italiano
    • Infogram
    • Charts
    • Infographics
    • Support

    • Prezi Next Support
    • Prezi Classic Support
    • Blog

    • Latest posts

    © 2018 Prezi Inc.
    Terms & Privacy Policy

    Prezi

    • Product
    • Gallery
    • The Science
    • Conversational Presenting
    • For Business
    • Testimonials

    Infogram

    • Infogram
    • Charts
    • Infographics

    Company

    • About
    • Team
    • Careers
    • Our Values
    • Press
    • Our Customers
    • Company Information
    • Contact Us

    Support

    • Prezi Next Support
    • Prezi Classic Support

    Languages

    • English
    • Español
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • Deutsch
    • Português
    • Français
    • Magyar
    • Italiano

    © 2018 Prezi Inc.
    Terms & Privacy Policy

    Course Hero Logo
    Course Hero Symbol

      • Find Study Resources

        • Main Menu
        • by School
        • by Subject
        • by Study Guides
        • by Book

          Literature Study Guides
          Infographics

        Get Instant Tutoring Help

        Earn by Contributing

        • Main Menu
        • Earn Free Access
        • Upload Documents
        • Refer Your Friends
        • Become a Tutor
        • Scholarships


    • Find
      Study Resources

      • by School

      • by Subject

      • by Study Guides

      • by Book

        • Literature Study Guides

        • Infographics



    • Get Instant
      Tutoring Help



    • Earn by
      Contributing

      • Earn Free Access

        Learn More >

      • Upload Documents

      • Refer Your Friends

      • Earn Money

      • Become a Tutor

      • Scholarships

        Learn More >

    • Are you an educator?

    • Log in

    • Sign up

    Winona State University

    ENG

    ENG 111

    Food Inc. Response Essay

    Food Inc. Response Essay – ENG-111 Response to Documentary…


    • Winona State University


    • ENG 111

    • Essay


    • 2




    • 100%
      (3)
      3 out of 3 people found this document helpful

    • Click to edit the document details

    Info icon

    This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.



    View Full Document

    Right Arrow Icon

    ENG-111 Response to Documentary
    Professor Buel
    2/19/13
    Food Inc. Response
    Food Inc. is a strong documentary that displays a great balance of logos, ethos and
    pathos. I will be explaining the selections of experts and/or interviewees. The use of music or
    visuals. The time dedicated to various topics. If it is fairly balanced and why.
    I believe the way they had timeline the experts and interviewees was a great use of logos.
    They mold the way they want to show the feelings off the viewers by giving them facts about the
    food they are eating and how not right it is. They then show you the gross and disgusting images
    and information from actual farmers that “grow” these animals. For an example, we hear about
    how chickens are being made to grow twice as fast and then they show a farmer not letting
    interviewers come in. Immediately following the clips of Tyson saying no more interviews we
    are brought to Carole’s farm under Tyson. We learn the true stunning facts and the uncovered
    secret. We are shown with utterly breath taking facts that backs up the statements of the mutant
    Image of page 1

    Info icon
    This preview
    has intentionally blurred sections.
    Sign up to view the full version.



    View Full Document

    Right Arrow Icon

    Image of page 2
    This is the end of the preview.

    Sign up

    to access the rest of the document.

    • Spring 08
    • benson

    • Rhetoric,
      Food Inc., Food INC, various topics


    • Click to edit the document details

    • Facebook Icon
    • Twitter Icon
    • Email Icon
    • URL Icon
      Share this link with a friend:


      Copied!


    Report



    View Full Document

    Right Arrow Icon

    course hero literature study guides

    Literature Study Guides

    Learn more about characters, symbols, and themes in all your favorite books with Course Hero’s
    FREE study guides and infographics!

    Explore

    Frequently Viewed Documents for ENG 111

    • 2 pages
      Good Form analysis

      • Good Form analysis
      • Winona State University
      • ENG 111

        Fall 2013

      Good Form analysis

    • 2 pages
      Speaker Essay

      • Speaker Essay
      • Winona State University
      • ENG 111

        Fall 2013

      Speaker Essay

    • 3 pages
      Sample interpretation of the Things they Carried

      • Sample interpretation of the Things they Carried
      • Winona State University
      • ENG 111

        Fall 2013

      Sample interpretation of the Things they Carried

    • 3 pages
      Final

      • Final
      • Winona State University
      • ENG 111

        Fall 2013

      Final

    • 2 pages
      The things they carried outline essay

      • The things they carried outline essay
      • Winona State University
      • ENG 111

        Fall 2013

      The things they carried outline essay

    • 3 pages
      The Living Dead essay

      • The Living Dead essay
      • Winona State University
      • ENG 111

        Fall 2013

      The Living Dead essay

    View
    more

    • Bookmarked

      [ document.course.dept_acro ] [ document.course.course_num ]

      [ document.title ]

      [ document.bookmarkTime ]

    ENG 111

    Food Inc. Response Essay

    Viewing now

    Interested in Food Inc. Response Essay

    ?

    Bookmark it to view later.

    Bookmark Food Inc. Response Essay.

    Bookmarked!

    No bookmarked documents.



    Bookmark this doc

    Recently Viewed

    [ document.course.dept_acro ] [ document.course.course_num ]

    [ document.title ]

    satisfaction guaranteed seal

    Study on the go

    • Download the iOS

    • Download the Android app

    Related Study Documents

    4 pages
    Untitleddocument-13

    • Untitleddocument-13
    • Temple University
    • CALC 1041

      Fall 2014

    Untitleddocument-13

    4 pages
    the things they carried paper comparision paper

    • the things they carried paper comparision paper
    • Winona State University
    • ENG 111

      Fall 2013

    the things they carried paper comparision paper

    1 pages
    Don’t Blame the Eater Analysis

    • Don’t Blame the Eater Analysis
    • Winona State University
    • ENG 111

      Fall 2013

    Don’t Blame the Eater Analysis

    5 pages
    Reseach paper

    • Reseach paper
    • Winona State University
    • ENG 111

      Fall 2013

    Reseach paper

    3 pages
    Essay 2 Final

    • Essay 2 Final
    • Winona State University
    • ENG 111

      Fall 2013

    Essay 2 Final

    4 pages
    The Things They Carried Essay

    • The Things They Carried Essay
    • Winona State University
    • ENG 111

      Fall 2013

    The Things They Carried Essay

    [ snackBarMessage ]

    2/3

    PREVIEWS LEFT

    Sign up to access 24/7 study resources for your classes
    Sign Up
    Log in

    What students are saying

    • Left Quote Icon

      As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

      Student Picture

      Kiran
      Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

    • Left Quote Icon

      I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

      Student Picture

      Dana
      University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

    • Left Quote Icon

      The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

      Student Picture

      Jill
      Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern